AI in clinical practice

AI medical scribes in the UK: what they do and how to use one safely

An AI medical scribe listens to a consultation, or to your dictation, and drafts the clinical note, letter or summary for you to check and approve. In the UK the main options include Heidi, TORTUS, Accurx Scribe, Anathem and Microsoft Dragon Copilot, and NHS England now publishes guidance on using them safely. This guide covers what these tools do, how the UK options differ, what the guidance and UK GDPR expect of you, and the careful answer to whether you can simply use ChatGPT.

A clinician dictating notes after a consultation
The basics

What AI scribes and dictation tools do

The term covers three slightly different jobs, and it helps to know which one you need.

  • Ambient scribes listen to the consultation itself, with the patient's agreement, and draft a structured note from the conversation. They are what NHS England calls ambient voice technology (AVT).
  • AI dictation turns what the clinician says after the appointment into text, increasingly with formatting and medical vocabulary built in. This is the newer version of the digital dictation many consultants have used for years.
  • Letter and document drafting takes notes or dictation and produces the finished output: a GP letter, a referral, a discharge summary or a patient-friendly summary.

Many products now do all three. None of them removes the clinician's responsibility. They can mishear a drug name, drop a negative ("no chest pain" becoming "chest pain"), or add something that was never said. NHS England's guidance is clear that users must review and approve outputs before anything else happens with them.

AI tools for therapists

Counsellors, psychologists and psychotherapists are an obvious audience for AI notes, and an especially careful one. Recording a therapy session raises harder questions about consent and confidentiality than recording a physio assessment, and some clients will say no. Many therapists who use AI prefer to dictate a short summary after the session rather than record the session itself. Whichever you choose, the same governance steps below apply.

The options

The main AI medical scribe options in the UK

From each vendor's own website, checked October 2026. Regulatory claims are as the vendor states them; verify them before you rely on them.

ToolWhat it doesBuilt mainly forRegulatory status, as the vendor states itPublished price
HeidiAmbient notes, dictation, templates and documents; connects to practice systems including Cliniko and TM3Clinicians in most settings, including private practiceSays it is registered with the MHRA as a Class I medical device for summarisation, DTAC compliant, Cyber Essentials certified, with UK-hosted dataFree plan; paid plans from £45 per user a month
TORTUSAmbient notes, letters, referrals and suggested coding, filed into the patient record after approvalNHS trusts; GP practices through X-on; private organisations through a developer kitSays it holds UKCA Class IIa certification, DTAC compliance, Cyber Essentials Plus, ISO 27001 and ISO 13485Price on request
Accurx ScribeNotes and documents from consultations or free dictation, saved to EMIS and SystmOneNHS general practice and secondary careNot stated on its product page; governance documents via its Trust Centre£0.40 to £0.50 per registered patient a year, by list size
AnathemDrafts notes, forms and lettersHigh-stakes services, particularly mental health and policeNot confirmed on its website; ask for its MHRA registration and DCB0129 documentsPrice on request
Microsoft Dragon CopilotAmbient listening, Dragon Medical One dictation, and drafted letters and summaries from approved notesNHS and larger healthcare organisationsMicrosoft says it is registered with the MHRA as a Class I medical deviceNot published

Being on this list isn't a recommendation. NHS England keeps a self-certified register of ambient scribe suppliers, but says plainly that it doesn't endorse any of them, and the same caution applies here. Several practice management systems also sell their own scribes, including WriteUpp and Jane, and Clinicminds includes one for aesthetic clinics. Our guides to practice management software and aesthetic clinic software cover those.

The rules

What NHS England's guidance on ambient voice technology says

NHS England's guidance on AI-enabled ambient scribing products was first published in April 2025 and is now on version 3, last updated on 29 July 2026. In summary, a deploying organisation should:

  • Appoint a Clinical Safety Officer, a named clinician responsible for identifying and managing the risks.
  • Complete DCB0160 documentation, the clinical risk standard for organisations using health IT: a safety case, a hazard log and a plan for monitoring the tool in use.
  • Check the supplier has completed DCB0129, the matching standard for manufacturers.
  • Complete a Data Protection Impact Assessment. NHS England provides a template in its information governance guidance.
  • Check medical device status. Whether a scribe counts as a medical device depends on what the manufacturer says it is for. Summarising, suggesting codes or anything that edges towards clinical decisions needs checking against MHRA guidance.
  • Keep a human in the loop. Outputs must be reviewed and approved before they are used.

Two further points are easy to miss. A pilot or proof of concept doesn't exempt anyone from these steps, and the guidance suggests limiting pilots to about four months. And liability for claims arising from the tool can still sit with the organisation using it, so contracts need to say clearly who is responsible for what.

Does this apply to private clinics?

The guidance is written for health and care settings in England and is aimed mainly at NHS organisations. DCB0129 and DCB0160 are legally required of NHS bodies and of providers delivering NHS services; a purely private clinic is not bound in the same way. They are still the recognised UK benchmark for clinical safety in health software, and following them is the simplest way to show you took safety seriously if something goes wrong. The DCB0160 standard is free to read.

Data protection

UK GDPR, DPIAs and telling patients

A consultation recording and the note made from it are health data, which UK GDPR treats as special category data. That brings three practical duties.

Do a DPIA before you start

The ICO lists large-scale processing of special category data as something that always needs a data protection impact assessment, and treats innovative technology such as AI as a trigger when combined with other risk factors. It also says a DPIA is good practice for any major new project involving personal data (ICO: when do we need a DPIA?). For a small clinic, the DPIA doesn't need to be long, but it should answer:

  • What is recorded, and is audio kept or deleted after transcription?
  • Where is the data processed and stored, and by which subprocessors?
  • How long are transcripts and drafts kept?
  • Does the supplier use your data to train its models?
  • Who can access the outputs, and how are errors caught before they reach the record?

Have a proper contract

The supplier will be processing patient data on your behalf, so you need a data processing agreement with it. Ask for it before you sign up, not after.

Tell patients

Update your privacy notice, tell patients at the start of the appointment that you use a scribe, and make it easy for them to say no. A patient who declines should get exactly the same care.

The ChatGPT question

Can I use ChatGPT in clinical practice?

For tasks with no patient information, often yes, with care. For patient information, a personal ChatGPT account is the wrong tool.

Plenty of clinicians use general AI assistants for work that contains no patient information: drafting a leaflet, rewording a policy, summarising published guidance. That is reasonable, provided you check the output, because these tools can state wrong things confidently.

Putting identifiable patient information into a personal account is different. OpenAI says it may use content from its Free, Plus and Pro plans to train its models unless you switch that off (OpenAI Help Centre). More fundamentally, a personal account is an agreement between OpenAI and you as an individual, not a processing contract between your clinic and a supplier, which is what UK GDPR expects when someone else handles patient data for you. A general-purpose chatbot also hasn't been through the clinical safety and medical device steps that NHS England expects of a scribe.

Is ChatGPT GDPR compliant for healthcare?

No tool is GDPR compliant on its own; compliance depends on how you use it. OpenAI's business products are a different proposition from personal accounts: OpenAI says it doesn't train on business data by default, and since October 2025 it has offered UK data residency at rest for eligible API customers and new ChatGPT Enterprise and Edu workspaces. Even then, you would still need a lawful basis and a special category condition, a DPIA, a data processing agreement, transparency with patients and, for clinical documentation, a clinical safety assessment.

The practical answer: don't put identifiable patient information into a personal ChatGPT account. If you want AI help with clinical documentation, use a tool built and assured for that job, or a design where identifying details never reach the AI at all.

How to choose

How to choose an AI scribe for your clinic

  1. Decide the job. Ambient notes for every consultation, dictation after the appointment, or finished letters? The best tool for one is not always the best for the others.
  2. Check it works with your systems. If it can't file into your practice management system, someone ends up copying and pasting, which wipes out much of the time saved.
  3. Ask for the paperwork. DCB0129 safety case, MHRA registration status, DTAC, the data processing agreement, hosting location, retention periods and the training policy. A good supplier sends these without fuss.
  4. Trial it properly. Use it with consenting patients for a few weeks, and time the notes and letters before and after, so you know what it is really saving.
  5. Name a person responsible. Even in a small private clinic, someone should own the hazard log, review errors and decide when to stop.

If you would like help weighing up a tool, or working out whether AI is the right answer to your admin problem at all, our AI consulting work page explains how we approach it.

Honest answers

Common questions

What is the best AI medical scribe in the UK?

It depends on your setting. Many NHS GP practices can use Accurx Scribe or TORTUS through systems they already have. Private clinicians often start with Heidi, which has a free plan and connects to common practice systems. Larger organisations are looking at Microsoft Dragon Copilot. Check the regulatory paperwork and run a trial before deciding.

Is AI dictation for doctors in the UK safe to use?

It can be, when the tool is properly assured and a clinician reviews every output. Ask for the supplier's DCB0129 safety case and MHRA registration status, complete a DPIA, and keep a simple log of errors you catch. The risk isn't the dictation itself; it is unreviewed text going into the record.

Do I need patient consent to use an AI scribe?

You need to be transparent: update your privacy notice and tell patients at the start of the appointment, so they can decline. Your lawful basis under UK GDPR is usually the provision of care rather than consent, but asking patients is good practice, and some will prefer not to be recorded.

Can I use ChatGPT to write patient letters?

Not with identifiable patient information in a personal account. It isn't a processing contract your clinic controls, and it hasn't been through the clinical safety steps expected of a scribe. Use a tool built for clinical documentation, or a setup where identifying details are added only after the AI has done its part.

Are AI scribes medical devices?

Some are. NHS England's guidance says it depends on the manufacturer's intended purpose and points to MHRA guidance. Broadly, the more a tool does beyond transcription, such as summarising or suggesting codes, the more likely it is to count. Several suppliers state MHRA Class I registration, and TORTUS states UKCA Class IIa. Ask any supplier what its registration covers.

How much does an AI medical scribe cost?

Published prices vary widely. Heidi has a free plan and paid plans from £45 per user a month. Accurx Scribe is priced per registered patient per year for GP practices. WriteUpp and Jane sell scribe add-ons at £23.95 and £15 per practitioner a month. TORTUS, Anathem and Dragon Copilot price on request.

Where we come in

If letters are the bottleneck, we have built for that

We've built a custom AI tool for clinical practice that turns a clinician's dictation into a fully formatted patient letter in the clinic's own template. It is designed so that identifying patient details never reach the drafting step, and every letter is reviewed and approved by the clinician before it goes out.

If what you need is an ambient scribe for every consultation, one of the products above is likely the better fit, and we would tell you that on a call. Where we are useful is the narrower, repetitive job of clinical correspondence, built around the letters you already send.

See patient letter automation → Book a discovery call
Keep reading

Related guides

Practice management software

Cliniko, WriteUpp, Jane, Semble, Zanda and TM3 compared for UK practices. Read the comparison →

AI consulting for clinics

Where AI can take admin off your team, and where it shouldn't. See AI consulting →

Starting a private practice

Guides for practitioners setting up on their own. See the guides →

Weighing up AI for your clinic's admin?

Tell us where the hours go each week, and we will tell you honestly whether AI is the right fix, and if so, which kind.

Book a discovery call →
Book a discovery call →